GST Major Amnesty Scheme u/s 128A No Interest No Penalty for FY 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20 ...

Indian Highways Management Company Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner Delhi Department of Trade And Taxes And Anr. (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court has set aside a GST demand or ...

The Delhi High Court set aside an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) against Xerox India Limited. The order, dated ...

Karnataka High Court recently dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue in the case of PCIT Vs Ennoble Construction, challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order. The case revolved ...

As per the guidelines, FMEs must intimate IFSCA before appointing or replacing a KMP, and the authority will provide comments, if any, within seven working days. The FME and its controlling persons ...

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued two draft circulars for public comments concerning amendments to the Master Circulars for Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs) and ...

The latest notification omits entries numbered 40 and 47 from the list of CFSOs and introduces two new officers to the list. Shri Avinash Vajrapat has been appointed as a CFSO for the Eastern Region, ...

In the matter abovementioned ITAT Surat have held that PCIT rightly invoked jurisdiction u/s 263 as he observed that assessee failed to explain the nature and source of investment with necessary ...

Why Supreme Court never acted against this most atrocious, arbitrary and arrogant discrimination and cheating perpetrated right under the nose of Supreme Court in judiciary itself in distribution of ...

Any tax order, notice, or communication without a DIN is legally invalid and can be challenged in court and accordingly, all ...

1.1 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) is erroneous, ...

Delhi High Court held that Freight Logistic Support Service provided by appellant are not in the nature of Fee for Technical Services/ Fee for Included Services u/s. 9 (1) (vii) of the Income Tax Act ...